Sacks allowed by his line: offensive linemen ranked
Sacks as a share of the team's dropbacks in the games he started. It is the line and the quarterback together, and every lineman who starts beside him shares it. Fewer is better.
Why the box score misses it: No sack is charged to a single lineman in the box score.
A line stat, not one man's. This is his whole line's number: every lineman who starts beside him shares it, so it says how the unit is doing more than how he is. Linemen who start together are tied here and ordered by snaps played.
Mostly luck so far. At this point in the season the differences between players on this stat are mostly chance: on this few plays, a good number and a bad one look alike. It firms up as games are played. Players are still ordered below, but nobody is called elite or poor on it yet.
Players need at least 150 snaps to qualify, so nobody is ranked on a handful of plays. Lower is better.
Grades updated Rechecked every few hours on game days
- Line run success
- Sacks allowed by his line
- Penalties per 1,000 snaps
- Holding per 1,000 snaps
- False starts per 1,000 snaps
- Share of snaps when he plays
- Offensive snaps
- Games started
- Penalties
- Holding penalties
- False starts
161 of 161 offensive linemen
| Player | Against the league | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Colton McKivitzOL · SF | 2.0% | 152 | −18.2grade points downA clear change | |
| 1 | Connor ColbyOL · SF | 2.0% | 152 | −18.2grade points downA clear change | |
| 1 | Dominick PuniOL · SF | 2.0% | 152 | −18.2grade points downA clear change | |
| 1 | Jake BrendelOL · SF | 2.0% | 152 | −18.2grade points downA clear change | |
| 1 | Trent WilliamsOL · SF | 2.0% | 152 | −18.2grade points downA clear change | |
| 6 | Cooper BeebeOL · DAL | 2.9% | 205 | −3.8grade points downWithin the noise | |
| 6 | Terence SteeleOL · DAL | 2.9% | 205 | −3.8grade points downWithin the noise | |
| 6 | Tyler BookerOL · DAL | 2.9% | 205 | −3.8grade points downWithin the noise | |
| 6 | Tyler GuytonOL · DAL | 2.9% | 205 | −3.8grade points downWithin the noise | |
| 10 | Nick AllegrettiOL · WAS | 2.6% | 115 | – | |
| 11 | Alaric JacksonOL · LAR | 3.5% | 172 | −11.5grade points downLeaning that way | |
| 11 | Coleman SheltonOL · LAR | 3.5% | 172 | −11.5grade points downLeaning that way | |
| 11 | Kevin DotsonOL · LAR | 3.5% | 172 | −11.5grade points downLeaning that way | |
| 11 | Steve AvilaOL · LAR | 3.5% | 172 | −11.5grade points downLeaning that way | |
| 15 | Ben PowersOL · DEN | 3.5% | 171 | +10.9grade points upLeaning that way | |
| 15 | Garett BollesOL · DEN | 3.5% | 171 | +10.9grade points upLeaning that way | |
| 15 | Luke WattenbergOL · DEN | 3.5% | 171 | +10.9grade points upLeaning that way | |
| 15 | Mike McGlincheyOL · DEN | 3.5% | 171 | +10.9grade points upLeaning that way | |
| 15 | Quinn MeinerzOL · DEN | 3.5% | 171 | +10.9grade points upLeaning that way | |
| 20 | TJ BassOL · DAL | 3.7% | 162 | −12.1grade points downLeaning that way | |
| 21 | Ben BrownOL · NE | 2.5% | 80 | – | |
| 22 | DJ GlazeOL · LV | 4.2% | 191 | +5.2grade points upWithin the noise | |
| 22 | Kolton MillerOL · LV | 4.2% | 191 | +5.2grade points upWithin the noise | |
| 22 | Spencer BurfordOL · LV | 4.2% | 191 | +5.2grade points upWithin the noise | |
| 22 | Tyler LinderbaumOL · LV | 4.2% | 191 | +5.2grade points upWithin the noise | |
| 26 | Anthony BeltonOL · GB | 4.0% | 149 | +5.2grade points upWithin the noise | |
| 27 | Amarius MimsOL · CIN | 4.4% | 203 | +13.4grade points upLeaning that way | |
| 27 | Dalton RisnerOL · CIN | 4.4% | 203 | +13.4grade points upLeaning that way | |
| 27 | Dylan FairchildOL · CIN | 4.4% | 203 | +13.4grade points upLeaning that way | |
| 27 | Ted KarrasOL · CIN | 4.4% | 203 | +13.4grade points upLeaning that way | |
| 31 | Kingsley SuamataiaOL · KC | 3.7% | 107 | – | |
| 32 | Blake MillerOL · DET | 4.4% | 160 | −2.9grade points down | |
| 33 | Creed HumphreyOL · KC | 4.3% | 140 | +4.2grade points upWithin the noise | |
| 33 | Jaylon MooreOL · KC | 4.3% | 140 | +4.2grade points upWithin the noise | |
| 33 | Kahlil BensonOL · KC | 4.3% | 140 | +4.2grade points upWithin the noise | |
| 33 | Trey SmithOL · KC | 4.3% | 140 | +4.2grade points upWithin the noise | |
| 37 | Asim RichardsOL · NO | 4.1% | 122 | +1.6grade points up | |
| 38 | Laken TomlinsonOL · GB | 3.1% | 65 | – | |
| 38 | Travis GloverOL · GB | 3.1% | 65 | – | |
| 40 | Theo BenedetOL · CHI | 4.3% | 117 | −22.7grade points downA clear change |
How to read this table
- The number on the left is the league rank among offensive linemen, even when the list is filtered to one team. On a graded stat the rank allows for how many plays are behind each number: a player with a few plays has his number pulled toward the middle, so he cannot jump ahead of a player who did the same over many more.
- “Against the league” draws each player on the same strip: the ends are the 10th-best and 90th-best player, the shaded stretch is the middle half, and the tick is the median. Right is always better.
- “Lately” is the change in grade between a player's last 2 games and the games before them. The tag says whether the change is bigger than what a few plays could cause.
- Tick “Show the box score” to put the traditional totals next to the advanced number and sort by either.
Other leaderboards
Quarterbacks
Running backs
Wide receivers
Offensive linemen
Tight ends
Edge rushers
Interior linemen
Linebackers
Cornerbacks
Safeties
Kickers
Punters
Kick returners
14 positions · 6 advanced stats here · Compare two players
Data: nflverse play-by-play, CC BY 4.0. Also FTN charting, Pro Football Reference advanced stats, snap counts and injury reports, all through nflverse. Calculations and charts by Raiders Rundown.
More from the Lab
All 9 tools →- NFL Playoff MachineNewThrough week 5Pick every game left and watch the seeds, bracket and playoff odds move.
- Sunday Rooting GuideNewThrough week 5Which games to root for, ranked by how much each moves your team's playoff odds.
- This week's matchupsWeek 5Every game on the slate, position group by position group.
- Top playsThe snaps that moved the Raiders' chance to win the most.
- Scouting reportsWeek 5Where the Raiders have the edge on every opponent.
- How all 32 teams stack upQuarterback, line, receivers and coverage, ranked across the league.
- Will it last?The Raiders' hottest and coldest stats, against teams since 1999.
- Season twinsThe past teams that looked the most like these Raiders.