Players › Compare

Compare two players

Put two players who do the same job side by side. For each stat you see where both rank in the league, and whether the gap between them is bigger than the noise a few plays create.

Player one

Player two

Grades updated Rechecked every few hours on game days

A Los Angeles Rams · TE

Terrance Ferguson

39overall grade, well below average

36th of 38 tight ends

B Atlanta Falcons · TE

Kyle Pitts

48overall grade, about average

27th of 38 tight ends

On the stats that count, Terrance Ferguson and Kyle Pitts are too close to separate with the plays we have. 3 are too close to call.

The year so far: EPA per target

Where each has ranked among tight ends after every week. Solid line is Terrance Ferguson, dashed is Kyle Pitts.

WorstMiddleBestrecent12345Week 5: 24th percentileWeek 2: 21st percentileWeek 3: 20th percentile

Stat by stat

  • EPA per target

    Too close to call

    A −0.0330th of 38

    B −0.0229th of 38

  • Catches over expected

    Too close to call

    A −9.4 pts37th of 38

    B −2.3 pts31st of 38

  • Share of the team's passes

    Too close to call

    A 10%31st of 38

    B 10%30th of 38

Style

  • Average depth of targetTerrance Ferguson: 6.6 yds · Kyle Pitts: 6.3 yds
  • Deep targetsTerrance Ferguson: 8% · Kyle Pitts: 7%

“Clearly ahead” means the gap is bigger than what the plays behind each number could produce by chance. “Slightly” means it points one way but could still be noise.

← All players

Data: nflverse play-by-play, CC BY 4.0. Also FTN charting, Pro Football Reference advanced stats, snap counts and injury reports, all through nflverse. Calculations and charts by Raiders Rundown.

Terrance Ferguson vs Kyle Pitts: stats compared in context | Raiders Rundown