Players › Compare

Compare two players

Put two players who do the same job side by side. For each stat you see where both rank in the league, and whether the gap between them is bigger than the noise a few plays create.

Player one

Player two

Grades updated Rechecked every few hours on game days

A Los Angeles Rams · TE

Terrance Ferguson

39overall grade, well below average

36th of 38 tight ends

B Denver Broncos · TE

Evan Engram

42overall grade, below average

32nd of 38 tight ends

On the stats that count, Terrance Ferguson and Evan Engram are too close to separate with the plays we have. 4 are too close to call.

The year so far: EPA per target

Where each has ranked among tight ends after every week. Solid line is Terrance Ferguson, dashed is Evan Engram.

WorstMiddleBestrecent12345Week 3: 49th percentileWeek 4: 21st percentileWeek 5: 30th percentileWeek 2: 21st percentileWeek 3: 20th percentile

Stat by stat

  • EPA per target

    Too close to call

    A −0.0330th of 38

    B +0.1027th of 38

  • Catches over expected

    Too close to call

    A −9.4 pts37th of 38

    B −7.9 pts36th of 38

  • Drop rate (lower is better)

    Too close to call

    A 16.7%33rd of 34

    B 7.7%27th of 34

  • Share of the team's passes

    Too close to call

    A 10%31st of 38

    B 10%33rd of 38

Style

  • Average depth of targetTerrance Ferguson: 6.6 yds · Evan Engram: 5.5 yds
  • Deep targetsTerrance Ferguson: 8% · Evan Engram: 6%
  • Contested targetsTerrance Ferguson: 8% · Evan Engram: 0%
  • Screen targetsTerrance Ferguson: 8% · Evan Engram: 0%

“Clearly ahead” means the gap is bigger than what the plays behind each number could produce by chance. “Slightly” means it points one way but could still be noise.

← All players

Data: nflverse play-by-play, CC BY 4.0. Also FTN charting, Pro Football Reference advanced stats, snap counts and injury reports, all through nflverse. Calculations and charts by Raiders Rundown.

Terrance Ferguson vs Evan Engram: stats compared in context | Raiders Rundown