Players › Compare

Compare two players

Put two players who do the same job side by side. For each stat you see where both rank in the league, and whether the gap between them is bigger than the noise a few plays create.

Player one

Player two

Grades updated Rechecked every few hours on game days

A New Orleans Saints · TE

Noah Fant

39overall grade, well below average

37th of 38 tight ends

B Tennessee Titans · TE

Gunnar Helm

42overall grade, below average

33rd of 38 tight ends

On the stats that count, Noah Fant and Gunnar Helm are too close to separate with the plays we have. 4 are too close to call.

The year so far: EPA per target

Where each has ranked among tight ends after every week. Solid line is Noah Fant, dashed is Gunnar Helm.

WorstMiddleBestrecent12345Week 3: 9th percentileWeek 4: 9th percentileWeek 5: 11th percentileWeek 1: 0th percentileWeek 3: 6th percentileWeek 5: 5th percentile

Stat by stat

  • EPA per target

    Too close to call

    A −0.2936th of 38

    B −0.1734th of 38

  • Catches over expected

    Too close to call

    A −4.0 pts32nd of 38

    B +3.0 pts19th of 38

  • Drop rate (lower is better)

    Too close to call

    A 0.0%1st of 34

    B 0.0%1st of 34

  • Share of the team's passes

    Too close to call

    A 10%34th of 38

    B 9%36th of 38

Style

  • Average depth of targetNoah Fant: 5.1 yds · Gunnar Helm: 4.3 yds
  • Deep targetsNoah Fant: 0% · Gunnar Helm: 0%
  • Contested targetsNoah Fant: 17% · Gunnar Helm: 15%
  • Screen targetsNoah Fant: 0% · Gunnar Helm: 8%

“Clearly ahead” means the gap is bigger than what the plays behind each number could produce by chance. “Slightly” means it points one way but could still be noise.

← All players

Data: nflverse play-by-play, CC BY 4.0. Also FTN charting, Pro Football Reference advanced stats, snap counts and injury reports, all through nflverse. Calculations and charts by Raiders Rundown.

Noah Fant vs Gunnar Helm: stats compared in context | Raiders Rundown