Players › Compare

Compare two players

Put two players who do the same job side by side. For each stat you see where both rank in the league, and whether the gap between them is bigger than the noise a few plays create.

Player one

Player two

Grades updated Rechecked every few hours on game days

A Buffalo Bills · DL

Deone Walker

56overall grade, above average

19th of 96 interior linemen

B Denver Broncos · DL

Malcolm Roach

53overall grade, about average

35th of 96 interior linemen

On the stats that count, Deone Walker and Malcolm Roach are too close to separate with the plays we have. 4 are too close to call.

The year so far: Pressures per 100 snaps

Where each has ranked among interior linemen after every week. Solid line is Deone Walker, dashed is Malcolm Roach.

WorstMiddleBestrecent12345Week 2: 77th percentileWeek 3: 66th percentileWeek 4: 67th percentileWeek 1: 63rd percentileWeek 2: 90th percentileWeek 3: 83rd percentileWeek 4: 90th percentile

Stat by stat

  • Pressures per 100 snaps

    Too close to call

    A 3.511th of 96

    B 2.534th of 96

  • Sacks per 100 snaps

    Too close to call

    A 0.530th of 96

    B 0.624th of 96

  • Tackles for loss per 100 snaps

    Too close to call

    A 1.514th of 96

    B 1.98th of 96

  • Missed tackles (lower is better)

    Too close to call

    A 14%15th of 20

    B 19%17th of 20

“Clearly ahead” means the gap is bigger than what the plays behind each number could produce by chance. “Slightly” means it points one way but could still be noise.

← All players

Data: nflverse play-by-play, CC BY 4.0. Also FTN charting, Pro Football Reference advanced stats, snap counts and injury reports, all through nflverse. Calculations and charts by Raiders Rundown.

Deone Walker vs Malcolm Roach: stats compared in context | Raiders Rundown