Raiders Rundown logo

Players › Compare

Compare two players

Put two players who do the same job side by side. For each stat you see where both rank in the league, and whether the gap between them is bigger than the noise a few plays create.

Player one

Player two

Grades updated Rechecked every few hours on game days

A Chicago Bears · TE

Colston Loveland

37overall grade, well below average

38th of 38 tight ends

B Washington Commanders · TE

Chig Okonkwo

44overall grade, below average

30th of 38 tight ends

On the stats that count, Colston Loveland and Chig Okonkwo are too close to separate with the plays we have. 3 are too close to call.

The year so far: EPA per target

Where each has ranked among tight ends after every week. Solid line is Colston Loveland, dashed is Chig Okonkwo.

WorstMiddleBestrecent12345Week 5: 38th percentileWeek 3: 17th percentileWeek 4: 6th percentileWeek 5: 3rd percentile

Stat by stat

  • EPA per target

    Chig Okonkwo is slightly ahead

    A −0.3937th of 38

    B +0.1424th of 38

  • Catches over expected

    Too close to call

    A −16.1 pts38th of 38

    B −6.6 pts34th of 38

  • Yards after catch over expected

    Too close to call

    A −0.4 yds18th of 36

    B −0.8 yds25th of 36

  • Share of the team's passes

    Too close to call

    A 13%23rd of 38

    B 12%25th of 38

Style

  • Average depth of targetColston Loveland: 6.3 yds · Chig Okonkwo: 7.7 yds
  • Deep targetsColston Loveland: 0% · Chig Okonkwo: 23%

“Clearly ahead” means the gap is bigger than what the plays behind each number could produce by chance. “Slightly” means it points one way but could still be noise.

← All players

Data: nflverse play-by-play, CC BY 4.0. Also FTN charting, Pro Football Reference advanced stats, snap counts and injury reports, all through nflverse. Calculations and charts by Raiders Rundown.

More from the Lab

All 9 tools →
Colston Loveland vs Chig Okonkwo: stats compared in context | Raiders Rundown