Raiders Rundown logo

PHI Philadelphia Eagles · DB· #2

Riq Woolen

Age
27
Height
6'4"
Weight
210 lbs
College
Texas-San Antonio
Drafted
2022, No. 153 overall (SEA)
Experience
5th NFL season
Compare with another playerCornerbacks leaderboard

51

Overall grade

47th of 96 cornerbacks

Typical

about average; 50 is average

Grades updated Rechecked every few hours on game days

The read

Riq's best number is missed tackles: 0%, 1st of 90 among cornerbacks.

Lately he is playing worse. Completion rate allowed is 80% over the last 2 games (10 targets), against 40% before that. The change points one way, but a few plays could still explain it.

Back in the lineup: He missed 1 game earlier, then played all of the last 2 games, on the field for nearly every play when he plays.

Written from his numbers, not from film. 5 games are behind the season figures.

How he stacks up

Every graded stat at a glance, against all the cornerbacks in the league.

  • Missed tackles0%1st of 90
  • Completion rate allowed60%45th of 96small sample
  • Passes defended per target10%55th of 96small sample
  • Yards allowed per target8.060th of 96small sample
  • Passer rating allowed9764th of 96

Left is the worst at his job, right is the best, and the line down the middle is average. The bubble is his percentile: 90 means better than nine in ten qualifying cornerbacks. Faded bars are still small samples.

How he has progressed

Where he has ranked among cornerbacks after each week, and every game behind it.

WorstMiddleBestrecent12345Week 2: 81st percentileWeek 3: 77th percentileWeek 4: 36th percentile36th

Season rank slipped: 81st to 36th percentile since Wk 2.

The line is his season-to-date rank among players at his position after each week, from 100 (the best) to 0 (the worst). It rises when he passes other players, not when he has one big game. Early weeks are noisier because fewer plays are behind them. The shaded weeks are the recent stretch.

Yards allowed per target game by game
WeekOpponentThat gametargetsSeason rank after
1vs WAS0.25–
2vs TEN9.2581st pct
3vs CHI7.3377th pct
4vs LAR13.0736th pct

Lower is better for this stat. One game is a small sample: a single stat over 5 targets can swing on a handful of plays. Shaded rows are the recent stretch.

The numbers, in context

Each one against every cornerback with at least 10 targets. Right on the strip is better.

Yards allowed per target

Below typical

8.0lower is better

60th of 96 cornerbacks · bottom 39%

The yards the receiver he is covering gets each time he is targeted. Fewer is better.

The box score: Interceptions are rare and say little about the hundred plays where he is just covering.

Does it show up in winning? Across 143 games league-wide, teams won 72% of the time when their cornerback was in the best third on yards allowed per target, and 55% when he was in the worst third.

Last 2 games: 11.3 (10) vs 4.7 before−20.6grade points downA clear change

Small sample: could move a lot · 20 targets · true level likely 4.5 to 11.5

Passer rating allowed

Below typical

97lower is better

64th of 96 cornerbacks · bottom 35%

The passer rating of quarterbacks throwing at him. 158.3 is perfect for the passer, so lower is better for the defender.

The box score: Not in the box score.

Does it show up in winning? Across 143 games league-wide, teams won 72% of the time when their cornerback was in the best third on passer rating allowed, and 53% when he was in the worst third.

Last 2 games: 110 (10) vs 85 before−8.5grade points downLeaning that way

Sample still growing · 20 targets · true level likely 77 to 117

Completion rate allowed

Typical

60%lower is better

45th of 96 cornerbacks · top 47%

The share of passes thrown at him that are completed. Fewer is better.

The box score: Not in the box score.

Does it show up in winning? Across 143 games league-wide, a good or bad game on completion rate allowed from a cornerback has not lined up much with his team winning (64% wins in the best third, 53% in the worst).

Last 2 games: 80% (10) vs 40% before−27.8grade points downA clear change

Small sample: could move a lot · 20 targets · true level likely 42% to 78%

Passes defended per target

Typical

10%

55th of 96 cornerbacks · bottom 44%

How often a pass thrown at him ends with him breaking it up. A cornerback does this far more often than he intercepts.

The box score: Passes defended are counted, but never against how often he was tested.

Does it show up in winning? Across 143 games league-wide, a good or bad game on passes defended per target from a cornerback has not lined up much with his team winning (60% wins in the best third, 68% in the worst).

Last 2 games: 10% (10) vs 10% before−1.1grade points downWithin the noise

Small sample: could move a lot · 20 targets · true level likely -3% to 23%

Missed tackles

Elite

0%lower is better

1st of 90 cornerbacks · top 2%

The share of his tackle chances he missed. Fewer is better.

The box score: Tackle totals reward the player who gets the most chances, not the one who finishes them.

Does it show up in winning? Across 168 games league-wide, teams won 55% of the time when their cornerback was in the best third on missed tackles, and 43% when he was in the worst third.

Last 2 games: 0% (12) vs 0% before

Sample still growing · 16 tackle chances · true level likely -9% to 9%

How he plays

Tendencies: how his game differs from the cornerbacks around him. These are not better or worse, only different, and often say as much about the offense or defense he plays in as about him.

Depth of passes at him

Style

13.6 yds

Is tested deep, more than most cornerbacks. A typical one is 10.6 yds.

How far downfield the passes thrown at him travel on average. It shows whether he is tested deep or underneath, which is a role, not a grade.

Sample still growing · 20 targets

Playing time

He has played in 3 of his team's 4 games with snap counts, on the field for about 98% of the team's defensive plays when he plays.

Back in the lineup. He missed 1 game earlier, then played all of the last 2 games, on the field for nearly every play when he plays.

Each column is a game: the share of his team's defensive snaps he played. 80% means about 8 of every 10 plays. “Out” means he did not play; a question mark means snap counts are not posted yet. Shaded games are the recent stretch.

Game by game

Every game this season: how it ended for his team, how much he played, his box score, and the advanced numbers from that one game. One game is a small sample, so read the right-hand columns as a snapshot, not his level.

Riq Woolen game by game
GameResultSnapsTklSoloAstTFLSacksPressPBUIntMissedYds/targetRating againstComp % againstPBU/target
Wk 1 vs WASW 24–22Out1100000000.27920%0%
Wk 2 vs TENW 24–2096%3300001009.29060%20%
Wk 3 vs CHIL 7–2799%5320000007.38867%0%
Wk 4 vs LARL 20–24100%76100010013.011986%14%
Wk 5 vs JAXL 17–19–532000100––––

The box score

The traditional totals, with where each ranks among cornerbacks. A total rewards volume, which is why the advanced numbers above matter.

Riq Woolen box score totals
StatTotalRank
Tackles2123rd of 96
Solo tackles1614th of 96
Assisted tackles542nd of 96
Tackles for loss051st of 96
Sacks011th of 96
Pressures025th of 96
Passes defended334th of 96
Interceptions027th of 96
Missed tackles075th of 96

Players with a similar profile

The cornerbacks whose grades are closest to his across the same stats. Similar means similar numbers, not the same style of play.

Ranks are among players at the same job who have enough plays to be graded. Grades and rankings come from play-by-play, charting and snap-count data, so they cannot see blocking, route running or assignments. See how the grades work.

← All players

Data: nflverse play-by-play, CC BY 4.0. Also FTN charting, Pro Football Reference advanced stats, snap counts and injury reports, all through nflverse. Calculations and charts by Raiders Rundown.

More from the Lab

All 9 tools →