Raiders Rundown logo

PIT Pittsburgh Steelers · LB· #51

Nick Herbig

Age
24
Height
6'2"
Weight
240 lbs
College
Wisconsin
Drafted
2023, No. 132 overall (PIT)
Experience
4th NFL season
Compare with another playerEdge rushers leaderboard

44

Overall grade

101st of 132 edge rushers

Well below typical

below average; 50 is average

Grades updated Rechecked every few hours on game days

The read

Nick grades below average among edge rushers so far, with no number far from the middle.

Lately he is playing worse. Tackles for loss per 100 snaps is 0.0 over the last 2 games (55 snaps), against 4.4 before that. The change points one way, but a few plays could still explain it.

Written from his numbers, not from film. 4 games are behind the season figures.

How he stacks up

Every graded stat at a glance, against all the edge rushers in the league.

  • Tackles for loss per 100 snaps2.48th of 132small sample
  • Sacks per 100 snaps0.084th of 132small sample
  • Pressures per 100 snaps0.8116th of 132
  • Missed tackles25%55th of 58small sample

Left is the worst at his job, right is the best, and the line down the middle is average. The bubble is his percentile: 90 means better than nine in ten qualifying edge rushers. Faded bars are still small samples.

How he has progressed

Where he has ranked among edge rushers after each week, and every game behind it.

WorstMiddleBestrecent12345Week 2: 27th percentileWeek 3: 19th percentileWeek 4: 13th percentile13th

Season rank slipped: 27th to 13th percentile since Wk 2.

The line is his season-to-date rank among players at his position after each week, from 100 (the best) to 0 (the worst). It rises when he passes other players, not when he has one big game. Early weeks are noisier because fewer plays are behind them. The shaded weeks are the recent stretch.

Pressures per 100 snaps game by game
WeekOpponentThat gamesnapsSeason rank after
1vs ATL2.639–
2vs NE0.02927th pct
3vs CIN0.02719th pct
4vs CLE0.02813th pct

One game is a small sample: a single stat over 31 snaps can swing on a handful of plays. Shaded rows are the recent stretch.

The numbers, in context

Each one against every edge rusher with at least 80 snaps. Right on the strip is better.

Pressures per 100 snaps

Well below typical

0.8

116th of 132 edge rushers · bottom 13%

Sacks, hits and hurries as Pro Football Reference charts them, for every 100 snaps he plays. A pass rusher is doing his job on plays that never become a sack.

The box score: A sack total misses most of what a rusher does and depends on how many snaps he plays.

Does it show up in winning? Across 233 games league-wide, teams won 60% of the time when their edge rusher was in the best third on pressures per 100 snaps, and 47% when he was in the worst third.

Last 2 games: 0.0 (55) vs 1.5 before−5.2grade points downWithin the noise

Sample still growing · 123 snaps · true level likely -0.5 to 2.2

Sacks per 100 snaps

Below typical

0.0

84th of 132 edge rushers · bottom 38%

Sacks for every 100 snaps he plays. Rare, so it swings fast; pressures are the steadier read.

The box score: A sack total ignores how many snaps he played.

Does it show up in winning? Across 233 games league-wide, a good or bad game on sacks per 100 snaps from a edge rusher has not lined up much with his team winning (47% wins in the best third, 60% in the worst).

Last 2 games: 0.0 (55) vs 0.0 beforeevenWithin the noise

Small sample: could move a lot · 123 snaps · true level likely -1.3 to 1.3

Tackles for loss per 100 snaps

Elite

2.4

8th of 132 edge rushers · top 7%

Plays he ends behind the line of scrimmage, for every 100 snaps.

The box score: Tackles for loss are counted, but never against the snaps he played.

Does it show up in winning? Across 233 games league-wide, a good or bad game on tackles for loss per 100 snaps from a edge rusher has not lined up much with his team winning (53% wins in the best third, 55% in the worst).

Last 2 games: 0.0 (55) vs 4.4 before−30.2grade points downLeaning that way

Small sample: could move a lot · 123 snaps · true level likely 0.1 to 4.8

Missed tackles

Among the weakest

25%lower is better

55th of 58 edge rushers · bottom 7%

The share of his tackle chances he missed. Fewer is better.

The box score: Tackle totals reward the player who gets the most chances, not the one who finishes them.

Does it show up in winning? Across 96 games league-wide, a good or bad game on missed tackles from a edge rusher has not lined up much with his team winning (50% wins in the best third, 41% in the worst).

Last 2 games: 40% (5) vs 18% before−27.7grade points downLeaning that way

Small sample: could move a lot · 16 tackle chances · true level likely 7% to 43%

Playing time

He has played in 4 of his team's 4 games with snap counts, on the field for about 52% of the team's defensive plays when he plays.

Each column is a game: the share of his team's defensive snaps he played. 80% means about 8 of every 10 plays. “Out” means he did not play; a question mark means snap counts are not posted yet. Shaded games are the recent stretch.

Game by game

Every game this season: how it ended for his team, how much he played, his box score, and the advanced numbers from that one game. One game is a small sample, so read the right-hand columns as a snapshot, not his level.

Nick Herbig game by game
GameResultSnapsTklSoloAstTFLSacksPressPBUIntMissedPressures/100TFL/100Missed
Wk 1 vs ATLW 20–1365%2110010022.60.050%
Wk 2 vs NEL 3–2053%3123000000.010.30%
Wk 3 vs CINW 30–2747%1100000010.00.050%
Wk 4 vs CLEL 24–2744%2110000010.00.033%

The box score

The traditional totals, with where each ranks among edge rushers. A total rewards volume, which is why the advanced numbers above matter.

Nick Herbig box score totals
StatTotalRank
Tackles885th of 132
Solo tackles478th of 132
Assisted tackles476th of 132
Tackles for loss322nd of 132
Sacks084th of 132
Pressures1104th of 132
Passes defended050th of 132
Interceptions010th of 132
Missed tackles43rd of 132

Players with a similar profile

The edge rushers whose grades are closest to his across the same stats. Similar means similar numbers, not the same style of play.

Ranks are among players at the same job who have enough plays to be graded. Grades and rankings come from play-by-play, charting and snap-count data, so they cannot see blocking, route running or assignments. See how the grades work.

← All players

Data: nflverse play-by-play, CC BY 4.0. Also FTN charting, Pro Football Reference advanced stats, snap counts and injury reports, all through nflverse. Calculations and charts by Raiders Rundown.

More from the Lab

All 9 tools →