ATL Atlanta Falcons · DB· #21

Mike Hughes

Age
29
Height
5'10"
Weight
191 lbs
College
UCF; Garden City CC; North Carolina
Drafted
2018, No. 30 overall (MIN)
Experience
9th NFL season

45

Overall grade

76th of 96 cornerbacks

Well below typical

below average; 50 is average

Grades updated Rechecked every few hours on game days

The read

Mike grades below average among cornerbacks so far, with no number far from the middle.

Role is shrinking: When he plays he is on the field for about 8 of every 10 plays lately, down from nearly every play before.

Written from his numbers, not from film. 5 games are behind the season figures.

How he stacks up

Every graded stat at a glance, against all the cornerbacks in the league.

  • Passes defended per target12%44th of 96small sample
  • Completion rate allowed60%45th of 96small sample
  • Missed tackles14%67th of 90small sample
  • Yards allowed per target9.778th of 96small sample
  • Passer rating allowed11588th of 96

Left is the worst at his job, right is the best, and the line down the middle is average. The bubble is his percentile: 90 means better than nine in ten qualifying cornerbacks. Faded bars are still small samples.

How he has progressed

Where he has ranked among cornerbacks after each week, and every game behind it.

WorstMiddleBestrecent12345Week 1: 48th percentileWeek 2: 19th percentileWeek 3: 12th percentileWeek 4: 18th percentile18th

Season rank slipped: 48th to 18th percentile since Wk 1.

The line is his season-to-date rank among players at his position after each week, from 100 (the best) to 0 (the worst). It rises when he passes other players, not when he has one big game. Early weeks are noisier because fewer plays are behind them. The shaded weeks are the recent stretch.

Yards allowed per target game by game
WeekOpponentThat gametargetsSeason rank after
1vs PIT6.3848th pct
2vs CAR18.5419th pct
3vs GB10.8912th pct
4vs NO5.3418th pct

Lower is better for this stat. One game is a small sample: a single stat over 6 targets can swing on a handful of plays. Shaded rows are the recent stretch.

The numbers, in context

Each one against every cornerback with at least 10 targets. Right on the strip is better.

Yards allowed per target

Well below typical

9.7lower is better

78th of 96 cornerbacks · bottom 20%

The yards the receiver he is covering gets each time he is targeted. Fewer is better.

The box score: Interceptions are rare and say little about the hundred plays where he is just covering.

Does it show up in winning? Across 143 games league-wide, teams won 72% of the time when their cornerback was in the best third on yards allowed per target, and 55% when he was in the worst third.

Last 2 games: 9.1 (13) vs 10.3 before+3.3grade points upWithin the noise

Small sample: could move a lot · 25 targets · true level likely 6.6 to 12.8

Passer rating allowed

Among the weakest

115lower is better

88th of 96 cornerbacks · bottom 10%

The passer rating of quarterbacks throwing at him. 158.3 is perfect for the passer, so lower is better for the defender.

The box score: Not in the box score.

Does it show up in winning? Across 143 games league-wide, teams won 72% of the time when their cornerback was in the best third on passer rating allowed, and 53% when he was in the worst third.

Last 2 games: 119 (13) vs 112 before−1.1grade points downWithin the noise

Sample still growing · 25 targets · true level likely 97 to 133

Completion rate allowed

Typical

60%lower is better

45th of 96 cornerbacks · top 47%

The share of passes thrown at him that are completed. Fewer is better.

The box score: Not in the box score.

Does it show up in winning? Across 143 games league-wide, a good or bad game on completion rate allowed from a cornerback has not lined up much with his team winning (64% wins in the best third, 53% in the worst).

Last 2 games: 62% (13) vs 58% before−2.0grade points downWithin the noise

Small sample: could move a lot · 25 targets · true level likely 44% to 76%

Passes defended per target

Typical

12%

44th of 96 cornerbacks · top 46%

How often a pass thrown at him ends with him breaking it up. A cornerback does this far more often than he intercepts.

The box score: Passes defended are counted, but never against how often he was tested.

Does it show up in winning? Across 143 games league-wide, a good or bad game on passes defended per target from a cornerback has not lined up much with his team winning (60% wins in the best third, 68% in the worst).

Last 2 games: 8% (13) vs 17% before−9.2grade points downWithin the noise

Small sample: could move a lot · 25 targets · true level likely 0% to 24%

Missed tackles

Below typical

14%lower is better

67th of 90 cornerbacks · bottom 27%

The share of his tackle chances he missed. Fewer is better.

The box score: Tackle totals reward the player who gets the most chances, not the one who finishes them.

Does it show up in winning? Across 168 games league-wide, teams won 55% of the time when their cornerback was in the best third on missed tackles, and 43% when he was in the worst third.

Last 2 games: 0% (11) vs 27% before+24.4grade points upA clear change

Small sample: could move a lot · 22 tackle chances · true level likely 1% to 27%

How he plays

Tendencies: how his game differs from the cornerbacks around him. These are not better or worse, only different, and often say as much about the offense or defense he plays in as about him.

Depth of passes at him

Style

13.3 yds

Is tested deep, more than most cornerbacks. A typical one is 10.6 yds.

How far downfield the passes thrown at him travel on average. It shows whether he is tested deep or underneath, which is a role, not a grade.

Sample still growing · 25 targets

Playing time

He has played in 4 of his team's 4 games with snap counts, on the field for about 88% of the team's defensive plays when he plays.

Role is shrinking. When he plays he is on the field for about 8 of every 10 plays lately, down from nearly every play before.

Each column is a game: the share of his team's defensive snaps he played. 80% means about 8 of every 10 plays. “Out” means he did not play; a question mark means snap counts are not posted yet. Shaded games are the recent stretch.

Game by game

Every game this season: how it ended for his team, how much he played, his box score, and the advanced numbers from that one game. One game is a small sample, so read the right-hand columns as a snapshot, not his level.

Mike Hughes game by game
GameResultSnapsTklSoloAstTFLSacksPressPBUIntMissedYds/targetRating againstComp % againstPBU/target
Wk 1 vs PITL 13–20100%2200002036.310950%25%
Wk 2 vs CARL 3–34100%52300000018.511775%0%
Wk 3 vs GBW 35–1485%65100000010.814267%0%
Wk 4 vs NOW 45–2465%4311001005.36650%25%
Wk 5 vs BALL 23–30–633000000––––

The box score

The traditional totals, with where each ranks among cornerbacks. A total rewards volume, which is why the advanced numbers above matter.

Mike Hughes box score totals
StatTotalRank
Tackles2314th of 96
Solo tackles1519th of 96
Assisted tackles815th of 96
Tackles for loss119th of 96
Sacks011th of 96
Pressures025th of 96
Passes defended334th of 96
Interceptions027th of 96
Missed tackles313th of 96

Players with a similar profile

The cornerbacks whose grades are closest to his across the same stats. Similar means similar numbers, not the same style of play.

Ranks are among players at the same job who have enough plays to be graded. Grades and rankings come from play-by-play, charting and snap-count data, so they cannot see blocking, route running or assignments. See how the grades work.

← All players

Data: nflverse play-by-play, CC BY 4.0. Also FTN charting, Pro Football Reference advanced stats, snap counts and injury reports, all through nflverse. Calculations and charts by Raiders Rundown.