Players › Compare

Compare two players

Put two players who do the same job side by side. For each stat you see where both rank in the league, and whether the gap between them is bigger than the noise a few plays create.

Player one

Player two

Grades updated Rechecked every few hours on game days

A Los Angeles Rams · DB

Trent McDuffie

71overall grade, elite

1st of 96 cornerbacks

B Minnesota Vikings · DB

James Pierre

65overall grade, well above average

3rd of 96 cornerbacks

On the stats that count, Trent McDuffie and James Pierre are too close to separate with the plays we have. 5 are too close to call.

The year so far: Yards allowed per target

Where each has ranked among cornerbacks after every week. Solid line is Trent McDuffie, dashed is James Pierre.

WorstMiddleBestrecent12345Week 2: 75th percentileWeek 3: 91st percentileWeek 4: 93rd percentileWeek 1: 97th percentileWeek 2: 96th percentileWeek 3: 100th percentileWeek 4: 100th percentile

Stat by stat

  • Yards allowed per target (lower is better)

    Too close to call

    A 2.01st of 96

    B 4.28th of 96

  • Passer rating allowed (lower is better)

    Too close to call

    A 381st of 96

    B 442nd of 96

  • Completion rate allowed (lower is better)

    Too close to call

    A 33%2nd of 96

    B 42%6th of 96

  • Passes defended per target

    Too close to call

    A 33%2nd of 96

    B 25%6th of 96

  • Missed tackles (lower is better)

    Too close to call

    A 0%1st of 90

    B 0%1st of 90

Style

  • Depth of passes at himTrent McDuffie: 8.2 yds · James Pierre: 12.1 yds

“Clearly ahead” means the gap is bigger than what the plays behind each number could produce by chance. “Slightly” means it points one way but could still be noise.

← All players

Data: nflverse play-by-play, CC BY 4.0. Also FTN charting, Pro Football Reference advanced stats, snap counts and injury reports, all through nflverse. Calculations and charts by Raiders Rundown.

Trent McDuffie vs James Pierre: stats compared in context | Raiders Rundown