Players › Compare

Compare two players

Put two players who do the same job side by side. For each stat you see where both rank in the league, and whether the gap between them is bigger than the noise a few plays create.

Player one

Player two

Grades updated Rechecked every few hours on game days

A Las Vegas Raiders · WR

Tre Tucker

48overall grade, about average

62nd of 94 wide receivers

B New England Patriots · WR

Efton Chism III

44overall grade, below average

77th of 94 wide receivers

On the stats that count, Tre Tucker and Efton Chism III are too close to separate with the plays we have. 3 are too close to call.

The year so far: EPA per target

Where each has ranked among wide receivers after every week. Solid line is Tre Tucker, dashed is Efton Chism III.

WorstMiddleBestrecent12345Week 5: 47th percentileWeek 2: 69th percentileWeek 3: 72nd percentileWeek 4: 48th percentileWeek 5: 50th percentile

Stat by stat

  • EPA per target

    Too close to call

    A +0.2848th of 94

    B +0.2350th of 94

  • Catches over expected

    Too close to call

    A +9.3 pts19th of 94

    B +6.4 pts28th of 94

  • Yards after catch over expected

    Too close to call

    A −2.8 yds79th of 83

    B −3.5 yds82nd of 83

  • Share of the team's passes

    Tre Tucker is slightly ahead

    A 14%51st of 94

    B 10%77th of 94

Style

  • Average depth of targetTre Tucker: 14.5 yds · Efton Chism III: 8.6 yds
  • Deep targetsTre Tucker: 26% · Efton Chism III: 8%

“Clearly ahead” means the gap is bigger than what the plays behind each number could produce by chance. “Slightly” means it points one way but could still be noise.

← All players

Data: nflverse play-by-play, CC BY 4.0. Also FTN charting, Pro Football Reference advanced stats, snap counts and injury reports, all through nflverse. Calculations and charts by Raiders Rundown.

Tre Tucker vs Efton Chism III: stats compared in context | Raiders Rundown