Players › Compare

Compare two players

Put two players who do the same job side by side. For each stat you see where both rank in the league, and whether the gap between them is bigger than the noise a few plays create.

Player one

Player two

Grades updated Rechecked every few hours on game days

A Washington Commanders · DL

Tim Settle

43overall grade, below average

69th of 96 interior linemen

B New Orleans Saints · DL

Nathan Shepherd

41overall grade, below average

84th of 96 interior linemen

On the stats that count, Tim Settle and Nathan Shepherd are too close to separate with the plays we have. 3 are too close to call.

The year so far: Pressures per 100 snaps

Where each has ranked among interior linemen after every week. Solid line is Tim Settle, dashed is Nathan Shepherd.

WorstMiddleBestrecent12345Week 1: 42nd percentileWeek 2: 60th percentileWeek 3: 55th percentileWeek 4: 53rd percentileWeek 3: 13th percentileWeek 4: 35th percentile

Stat by stat

  • Pressures per 100 snaps

    Too close to call

    A 1.160th of 96

    B 1.749th of 96

  • Sacks per 100 snaps

    Too close to call

    A 0.628th of 96

    B 0.339th of 96

  • Tackles for loss per 100 snaps

    Too close to call

    A 0.049th of 96

    B 0.049th of 96

“Clearly ahead” means the gap is bigger than what the plays behind each number could produce by chance. “Slightly” means it points one way but could still be noise.

← All players

Data: nflverse play-by-play, CC BY 4.0. Also FTN charting, Pro Football Reference advanced stats, snap counts and injury reports, all through nflverse. Calculations and charts by Raiders Rundown.

Tim Settle vs Nathan Shepherd: stats compared in context | Raiders Rundown