Players › Compare

Compare two players

Put two players who do the same job side by side. For each stat you see where both rank in the league, and whether the gap between them is bigger than the noise a few plays create.

Player one

Player two

Grades updated Rechecked every few hours on game days

A Los Angeles Rams · DB

Quentin Lake

59overall grade, above average

4th of 50 safeties

B Los Angeles Rams · DB

Kam Curl

55overall grade, about average

9th of 50 safeties

On the stats that count, Quentin Lake and Kam Curl are too close to separate with the plays we have. 5 are too close to call.

The year so far: Yards allowed per target

Where each has ranked among safeties after every week. Solid line is Quentin Lake, dashed is Kam Curl.

WorstMiddleBestrecent12345Week 2: 77th percentileWeek 3: 66th percentileWeek 4: 81st percentileWeek 1: 57th percentileWeek 2: 94th percentileWeek 3: 94th percentileWeek 4: 90th percentile

Stat by stat

  • Yards allowed per target (lower is better)

    Too close to call

    A 4.26th of 50

    B 5.912th of 50

  • Passer rating allowed (lower is better)

    Too close to call

    A 609th of 50

    B 7415th of 50

  • Completion rate allowed (lower is better)

    Too close to call

    A 58%27th of 50

    B 60%30th of 50

  • Passes defended per target

    Too close to call

    A 29%2nd of 50

    B 20%7th of 50

  • Missed tackles (lower is better)

    Too close to call

    A 9%58th of 84

    B 7%41st of 84

Style

  • Depth of passes at himQuentin Lake: 7.7 yds · Kam Curl: 10.7 yds

“Clearly ahead” means the gap is bigger than what the plays behind each number could produce by chance. “Slightly” means it points one way but could still be noise.

← All players

Data: nflverse play-by-play, CC BY 4.0. Also FTN charting, Pro Football Reference advanced stats, snap counts and injury reports, all through nflverse. Calculations and charts by Raiders Rundown.

Quentin Lake vs Kam Curl: stats compared in context | Raiders Rundown