Players › Compare

Compare two players

Put two players who do the same job side by side. For each stat you see where both rank in the league, and whether the gap between them is bigger than the noise a few plays create.

Player one

Player two

Grades updated Rechecked every few hours on game days

A Las Vegas Raiders · LB

Quay Walker

54overall grade, about average

24th of 65 linebackers

B Los Angeles Rams · LB

Nate Landman

55overall grade, above average

14th of 65 linebackers

On the stats that count, Quay Walker and Nate Landman are too close to separate with the plays we have. 4 are too close to call.

The year so far: Missed tackles

Where each has ranked among linebackers after every week. Solid line is Quay Walker, dashed is Nate Landman.

WorstMiddleBestrecent12345Week 1: 100th percentileWeek 2: 68th percentileWeek 3: 62nd percentileWeek 4: 75th percentileWeek 1: 24th percentileWeek 2: 71st percentileWeek 3: 73rd percentileWeek 4: 52nd percentile

Stat by stat

  • Missed tackles (lower is better)

    Too close to call

    A 6%30th of 65

    B 3%15th of 65

  • Tackles per 100 snaps

    Too close to call

    A 11.642nd of 63

    B 12.236th of 63

  • Tackles for loss per 100 snaps

    Too close to call

    A 0.831st of 63

    B 0.437th of 63

  • Yards allowed per target (lower is better)

    Too close to call

    A 3.94th of 44

    B 3.21st of 44

Style

  • Pressures per 100 snapsQuay Walker: 0.8 · Nate Landman: 0.4

“Clearly ahead” means the gap is bigger than what the plays behind each number could produce by chance. “Slightly” means it points one way but could still be noise.

← All players

Data: nflverse play-by-play, CC BY 4.0. Also FTN charting, Pro Football Reference advanced stats, snap counts and injury reports, all through nflverse. Calculations and charts by Raiders Rundown.

Quay Walker vs Nate Landman: stats compared in context | Raiders Rundown