Players › Compare

Compare two players

Put two players who do the same job side by side. For each stat you see where both rank in the league, and whether the gap between them is bigger than the noise a few plays create.

Player one

Player two

Grades updated Rechecked every few hours on game days

A Atlanta Falcons · K

Nick Folk

47overall grade, about average

21st of 31 kickers

B Denver Broncos · K

Wil Lutz

45overall grade, about average

23rd of 31 kickers

On the stats that count, Nick Folk and Wil Lutz are too close to separate with the plays we have. 3 are too close to call.

The year so far: Field goals over expected

Where each has ranked among kickers after every week. Solid line is Nick Folk, dashed is Wil Lutz.

WorstMiddleBestrecent12345Week 3: 14th percentileWeek 4: 20th percentileWeek 5: 7th percentileWeek 1: 0th percentileWeek 2: 0th percentileWeek 3: 4th percentileWeek 4: 3rd percentileWeek 5: 27th percentile

Stat by stat

  • Field goals over expected

    Too close to call

    A −11.7 pts23rd of 31

    B −15.9 pts29th of 31

  • Field goal percentage

    Too close to call

    A 75%23rd of 31

    B 73%27th of 31

  • EPA per kickoff

    Too close to call

    A −0.2413th of 33

    B −0.2311th of 33

Style

  • Average try distanceNick Folk: 41.3 yds · Wil Lutz: 38.2 yds
  • Tries from 50+Nick Folk: 25% · Wil Lutz: 18%
  • Kickoff touchbacksNick Folk: 0% · Wil Lutz: 9%

“Clearly ahead” means the gap is bigger than what the plays behind each number could produce by chance. “Slightly” means it points one way but could still be noise.

← All players

Data: nflverse play-by-play, CC BY 4.0. Also FTN charting, Pro Football Reference advanced stats, snap counts and injury reports, all through nflverse. Calculations and charts by Raiders Rundown.

Nick Folk vs Wil Lutz: stats compared in context | Raiders Rundown