Players › Compare

Compare two players

Put two players who do the same job side by side. For each stat you see where both rank in the league, and whether the gap between them is bigger than the noise a few plays create.

Player one

Player two

Grades updated Rechecked every few hours on game days

A Los Angeles Rams · LB

Nate Landman

55overall grade, above average

14th of 65 linebackers

B Las Vegas Raiders · LB

Quay Walker

54overall grade, about average

24th of 65 linebackers

On the stats that count, Nate Landman and Quay Walker are too close to separate with the plays we have. 4 are too close to call.

The year so far: Missed tackles

Where each has ranked among linebackers after every week. Solid line is Nate Landman, dashed is Quay Walker.

WorstMiddleBestrecent12345Week 1: 24th percentileWeek 2: 71st percentileWeek 3: 73rd percentileWeek 4: 52nd percentileWeek 1: 100th percentileWeek 2: 68th percentileWeek 3: 62nd percentileWeek 4: 75th percentile

Stat by stat

  • Missed tackles (lower is better)

    Too close to call

    A 3%15th of 65

    B 6%30th of 65

  • Tackles per 100 snaps

    Too close to call

    A 12.236th of 63

    B 11.642nd of 63

  • Tackles for loss per 100 snaps

    Too close to call

    A 0.437th of 63

    B 0.831st of 63

  • Yards allowed per target (lower is better)

    Too close to call

    A 3.21st of 44

    B 3.94th of 44

Style

  • Pressures per 100 snapsNate Landman: 0.4 · Quay Walker: 0.8

“Clearly ahead” means the gap is bigger than what the plays behind each number could produce by chance. “Slightly” means it points one way but could still be noise.

← All players

Data: nflverse play-by-play, CC BY 4.0. Also FTN charting, Pro Football Reference advanced stats, snap counts and injury reports, all through nflverse. Calculations and charts by Raiders Rundown.

Nate Landman vs Quay Walker: stats compared in context | Raiders Rundown