Players › Compare

Compare two players

Put two players who do the same job side by side. For each stat you see where both rank in the league, and whether the gap between them is bigger than the noise a few plays create.

Player one

Player two

Grades updated Rechecked every few hours on game days

A New York Giants · WR

Malachi Fields

49overall grade, about average

55th of 94 wide receivers

B Indianapolis Colts · WR

Laquon Treadwell

46overall grade, about average

71st of 94 wide receivers

On the stats that count, Malachi Fields and Laquon Treadwell are too close to separate with the plays we have. 4 are too close to call.

The year so far: EPA per target

Where each has ranked among wide receivers after every week. Solid line is Malachi Fields, dashed is Laquon Treadwell.

WorstMiddleBestrecent12345Week 4: 46th percentileWeek 5: 31st percentileWeek 2: 8th percentileWeek 3: 8th percentileWeek 4: 27th percentileWeek 5: 37th percentile

Stat by stat

  • EPA per target

    Too close to call

    A +0.1460th of 94

    B +0.0665th of 94

  • Catches over expected

    Too close to call

    A +2.5 pts44th of 94

    B −1.8 pts61st of 94

  • Yards after catch over expected

    Too close to call

    A +0.8 yds10th of 83

    B −0.7 yds37th of 83

  • Share of the team's passes

    Too close to call

    A 10%81st of 94

    B 10%76th of 94

Style

  • Average depth of targetMalachi Fields: 16.4 yds · Laquon Treadwell: 13.1 yds
  • Deep targetsMalachi Fields: 35% · Laquon Treadwell: 26%

“Clearly ahead” means the gap is bigger than what the plays behind each number could produce by chance. “Slightly” means it points one way but could still be noise.

← All players

Data: nflverse play-by-play, CC BY 4.0. Also FTN charting, Pro Football Reference advanced stats, snap counts and injury reports, all through nflverse. Calculations and charts by Raiders Rundown.

Malachi Fields vs Laquon Treadwell: stats compared in context | Raiders Rundown