Players › Compare

Compare two players

Put two players who do the same job side by side. For each stat you see where both rank in the league, and whether the gap between them is bigger than the noise a few plays create.

Player one

Player two

Grades updated Rechecked every few hours on game days

A Atlanta Falcons · TE

Kyle Pitts

48overall grade, about average

27th of 38 tight ends

B Seattle Seahawks · TE

AJ Barner

48overall grade, about average

26th of 38 tight ends

On the stats that count, Kyle Pitts and AJ Barner are too close to separate with the plays we have. 4 are too close to call.

The year so far: EPA per target

Where each has ranked among tight ends after every week. Solid line is Kyle Pitts, dashed is AJ Barner.

WorstMiddleBestrecent12345Week 3: 37th percentileWeek 4: 24th percentileWeek 5: 27th percentileWeek 5: 24th percentile

Stat by stat

  • EPA per target

    Too close to call

    A −0.0229th of 38

    B +0.0428th of 38

  • Catches over expected

    Too close to call

    A −2.3 pts31st of 38

    B −7.5 pts35th of 38

  • Yards after catch over expected

    Too close to call

    A +2.6 yds4th of 36

    B +2.8 yds3rd of 36

  • Share of the team's passes

    Too close to call

    A 10%30th of 38

    B 13%24th of 38

Style

  • Average depth of targetKyle Pitts: 6.3 yds · AJ Barner: 2.3 yds
  • Deep targetsKyle Pitts: 7% · AJ Barner: 0%

“Clearly ahead” means the gap is bigger than what the plays behind each number could produce by chance. “Slightly” means it points one way but could still be noise.

← All players

Data: nflverse play-by-play, CC BY 4.0. Also FTN charting, Pro Football Reference advanced stats, snap counts and injury reports, all through nflverse. Calculations and charts by Raiders Rundown.

Kyle Pitts vs AJ Barner: stats compared in context | Raiders Rundown