Players › Compare

Compare two players

Put two players who do the same job side by side. For each stat you see where both rank in the league, and whether the gap between them is bigger than the noise a few plays create.

Player one

Player two

Grades updated Rechecked every few hours on game days

A Los Angeles Rams · WR

Konata Mumpfield

39overall grade, well below average

84th of 94 wide receivers

B Pittsburgh Steelers · WR

Germie Bernard

44overall grade, below average

76th of 94 wide receivers

On the stats that count, Konata Mumpfield and Germie Bernard are too close to separate with the plays we have. 2 are too close to call.

The year so far: EPA per target

Where each has ranked among wide receivers after every week. Solid line is Konata Mumpfield, dashed is Germie Bernard.

WorstMiddleBestrecent12345Week 2: 9th percentileWeek 3: 10th percentileWeek 4: 7th percentileWeek 5: 19th percentileWeek 3: 76th percentileWeek 4: 22nd percentile

Stat by stat

  • EPA per target

    Too close to call

    A −0.0174th of 94

    B −0.0376th of 94

  • Catches over expected

    Too close to call

    A −12.6 pts82nd of 94

    B −4.2 pts67th of 94

  • Share of the team's passes

    Germie Bernard is slightly ahead

    A 8%89th of 94

    B 13%63rd of 94

Style

  • Average depth of targetKonata Mumpfield: 16.5 yds · Germie Bernard: 7.3 yds
  • Deep targetsKonata Mumpfield: 21% · Germie Bernard: 5%

“Clearly ahead” means the gap is bigger than what the plays behind each number could produce by chance. “Slightly” means it points one way but could still be noise.

← All players

Data: nflverse play-by-play, CC BY 4.0. Also FTN charting, Pro Football Reference advanced stats, snap counts and injury reports, all through nflverse. Calculations and charts by Raiders Rundown.

Konata Mumpfield vs Germie Bernard: stats compared in context | Raiders Rundown