Players › Compare

Compare two players

Put two players who do the same job side by side. For each stat you see where both rank in the league, and whether the gap between them is bigger than the noise a few plays create.

Player one

Player two

Grades updated Rechecked every few hours on game days

A Minnesota Vikings · DB

James Pierre

65overall grade, well above average

3rd of 96 cornerbacks

B Los Angeles Rams · DB

Trent McDuffie

71overall grade, elite

1st of 96 cornerbacks

On the stats that count, James Pierre and Trent McDuffie are too close to separate with the plays we have. 5 are too close to call.

The year so far: Yards allowed per target

Where each has ranked among cornerbacks after every week. Solid line is James Pierre, dashed is Trent McDuffie.

WorstMiddleBestrecent12345Week 1: 97th percentileWeek 2: 96th percentileWeek 3: 100th percentileWeek 4: 100th percentileWeek 2: 75th percentileWeek 3: 91st percentileWeek 4: 93rd percentile

Stat by stat

  • Yards allowed per target (lower is better)

    Too close to call

    A 4.28th of 96

    B 2.01st of 96

  • Passer rating allowed (lower is better)

    Too close to call

    A 442nd of 96

    B 381st of 96

  • Completion rate allowed (lower is better)

    Too close to call

    A 42%6th of 96

    B 33%2nd of 96

  • Passes defended per target

    Too close to call

    A 25%6th of 96

    B 33%2nd of 96

  • Missed tackles (lower is better)

    Too close to call

    A 0%1st of 90

    B 0%1st of 90

Style

  • Depth of passes at himJames Pierre: 12.1 yds · Trent McDuffie: 8.2 yds

“Clearly ahead” means the gap is bigger than what the plays behind each number could produce by chance. “Slightly” means it points one way but could still be noise.

← All players

Data: nflverse play-by-play, CC BY 4.0. Also FTN charting, Pro Football Reference advanced stats, snap counts and injury reports, all through nflverse. Calculations and charts by Raiders Rundown.

James Pierre vs Trent McDuffie: stats compared in context | Raiders Rundown