Players › Compare

Compare two players

Put two players who do the same job side by side. For each stat you see where both rank in the league, and whether the gap between them is bigger than the noise a few plays create.

Player one

Player two

Grades updated Rechecked every few hours on game days

A Detroit Lions · WR

Isaac TeSlaa

48overall grade, about average

60th of 94 wide receivers

B Las Vegas Raiders · WR

Cody White

47overall grade, about average

66th of 94 wide receivers

On the stats that count, Isaac TeSlaa and Cody White are too close to separate with the plays we have. 2 are too close to call.

The year so far: EPA per target

Where each has ranked among wide receivers after every week. Solid line is Isaac TeSlaa, dashed is Cody White.

WorstMiddleBestrecent12345Week 4: 93rd percentileWeek 5: 93rd percentileWeek 3: 90th percentileWeek 4: 75th percentileWeek 5: 54th percentile

Stat by stat

  • EPA per target

    Cody White is slightly ahead

    A +0.3244th of 94

    B +0.768th of 94

  • Catches over expected

    Too close to call

    A −13.9 pts87th of 94

    B −7.5 pts74th of 94

  • Share of the team's passes

    Too close to call

    A 10%83rd of 94

    B 8%92nd of 94

Style

  • Average depth of targetIsaac TeSlaa: 12.8 yds · Cody White: 10.6 yds
  • Deep targetsIsaac TeSlaa: 21% · Cody White: 14%

“Clearly ahead” means the gap is bigger than what the plays behind each number could produce by chance. “Slightly” means it points one way but could still be noise.

← All players

Data: nflverse play-by-play, CC BY 4.0. Also FTN charting, Pro Football Reference advanced stats, snap counts and injury reports, all through nflverse. Calculations and charts by Raiders Rundown.

Isaac TeSlaa vs Cody White: stats compared in context | Raiders Rundown