Players › Compare

Compare two players

Put two players who do the same job side by side. For each stat you see where both rank in the league, and whether the gap between them is bigger than the noise a few plays create.

Player one

Player two

Grades updated Rechecked every few hours on game days

A Los Angeles Rams · P

Ethan Evans

41overall grade, below average

31st of 33 punters

B Los Angeles Chargers · P

J.K. Scott

40overall grade, well below average

32nd of 33 punters

On the stats that count, Ethan Evans and J.K. Scott are too close to separate with the plays we have. 4 are too close to call.

The year so far: EPA per punt

Where each has ranked among punters after every week. Solid line is Ethan Evans, dashed is J.K. Scott.

WorstMiddleBestrecent12345Week 2: 0th percentileWeek 3: 0th percentileWeek 4: 3rd percentileWeek 5: 0th percentileWeek 2: 48th percentileWeek 3: 22nd percentileWeek 4: 6th percentile

Stat by stat

  • EPA per punt

    Too close to call

    A −0.3731st of 33

    B −0.4833rd of 33

  • Net yards per punt

    Too close to call

    A 37.9 yds33rd of 33

    B 40.5 yds25th of 33

  • Punts inside the 20

    Too close to call

    A 36%21st of 33

    B 30%29th of 33

  • Touchbacks (lower is better)

    Too close to call

    A 7%18th of 33

    B 10%27th of 33

Style

  • Gross punt averageEthan Evans: 47.6 yds · J.K. Scott: 46.0 yds
  • Fair catchesEthan Evans: 36% · J.K. Scott: 45%

“Clearly ahead” means the gap is bigger than what the plays behind each number could produce by chance. “Slightly” means it points one way but could still be noise.

← All players

Data: nflverse play-by-play, CC BY 4.0. Also FTN charting, Pro Football Reference advanced stats, snap counts and injury reports, all through nflverse. Calculations and charts by Raiders Rundown.

Ethan Evans vs J.K. Scott: stats compared in context | Raiders Rundown