Players › Compare

Compare two players

Put two players who do the same job side by side. For each stat you see where both rank in the league, and whether the gap between them is bigger than the noise a few plays create.

Player one

Player two

Grades updated Rechecked every few hours on game days

A Miami Dolphins · WR

Chris Bell

39overall grade, well below average

86th of 94 wide receivers

B Detroit Lions · WR

Isaac TeSlaa

48overall grade, about average

60th of 94 wide receivers

On the stats that count, Chris Bell and Isaac TeSlaa are too close to separate with the plays we have. 4 are too close to call.

The year so far: EPA per target

Where each has ranked among wide receivers after every week. Solid line is Chris Bell, dashed is Isaac TeSlaa.

WorstMiddleBestrecent12345Week 3: 90th percentileWeek 4: 75th percentileWeek 5: 54th percentileWeek 3: 59th percentileWeek 4: 38th percentileWeek 5: 24th percentile

Stat by stat

  • EPA per target

    Too close to call

    A +0.0172nd of 94

    B +0.3244th of 94

  • Catches over expected

    Too close to call

    A −17.1 pts89th of 94

    B −13.9 pts87th of 94

  • Drop rate (lower is better)

    Too close to call

    A 0.0%1st of 85

    B 0.0%1st of 85

  • Share of the team's passes

    Too close to call

    A 10%80th of 94

    B 10%83rd of 94

Style

  • Average depth of targetChris Bell: 19.1 yds · Isaac TeSlaa: 12.8 yds
  • Deep targetsChris Bell: 50% · Isaac TeSlaa: 21%
  • Contested targetsChris Bell: 58% · Isaac TeSlaa: 12%
  • Screen targetsChris Bell: 0% · Isaac TeSlaa: 0%

“Clearly ahead” means the gap is bigger than what the plays behind each number could produce by chance. “Slightly” means it points one way but could still be noise.

← All players

Data: nflverse play-by-play, CC BY 4.0. Also FTN charting, Pro Football Reference advanced stats, snap counts and injury reports, all through nflverse. Calculations and charts by Raiders Rundown.

Chris Bell vs Isaac TeSlaa: stats compared in context | Raiders Rundown