Players › Compare

Compare two players

Put two players who do the same job side by side. For each stat you see where both rank in the league, and whether the gap between them is bigger than the noise a few plays create.

Player one

Player two

Grades updated Rechecked every few hours on game days

A Arizona Cardinals · K

Chad Ryland

49overall grade, about average

16th of 31 kickers

B Atlanta Falcons · K

Nick Folk

47overall grade, about average

21st of 31 kickers

On the stats that count, Chad Ryland and Nick Folk are too close to separate with the plays we have. 4 are too close to call.

The year so far: Field goals over expected

Where each has ranked among kickers after every week. Solid line is Chad Ryland, dashed is Nick Folk.

WorstMiddleBestrecent12345Week 1: 0th percentileWeek 2: 0th percentileWeek 3: 4th percentileWeek 4: 3rd percentileWeek 5: 27th percentileWeek 1: 33rd percentileWeek 3: 57th percentileWeek 4: 60th percentileWeek 5: 53rd percentile

Stat by stat

  • Field goals over expected

    Too close to call

    A −2.5 pts15th of 31

    B −11.7 pts23rd of 31

  • Field goal percentage

    Too close to call

    A 80%17th of 31

    B 75%23rd of 31

  • Extra point percentage

    Too close to call

    A 100%1st of 29

    B 100%1st of 29

  • EPA per kickoff

    Too close to call

    A −0.2817th of 33

    B −0.2413th of 33

Style

  • Average try distanceChad Ryland: 43.7 yds · Nick Folk: 41.3 yds
  • Tries from 50+Chad Ryland: 30% · Nick Folk: 25%
  • Kickoff touchbacksChad Ryland: 15% · Nick Folk: 0%

“Clearly ahead” means the gap is bigger than what the plays behind each number could produce by chance. “Slightly” means it points one way but could still be noise.

← All players

Data: nflverse play-by-play, CC BY 4.0. Also FTN charting, Pro Football Reference advanced stats, snap counts and injury reports, all through nflverse. Calculations and charts by Raiders Rundown.

Chad Ryland vs Nick Folk: stats compared in context | Raiders Rundown