Players › Compare

Compare two players

Put two players who do the same job side by side. For each stat you see where both rank in the league, and whether the gap between them is bigger than the noise a few plays create.

Player one

Player two

Grades updated Rechecked every few hours on game days

A Chicago Bears · QB

Case Keenum

49overall grade, about average

26th of 40 quarterbacks

B Los Angeles Rams · QB

Matthew Stafford

49overall grade, about average

24th of 40 quarterbacks

On the stats that count, Case Keenum and Matthew Stafford are too close to separate with the plays we have. 4 are too close to call.

The year so far: EPA per dropback

Where each has ranked among quarterbacks after every week. Solid line is Case Keenum, dashed is Matthew Stafford.

WorstMiddleBestrecent12345Week 1: 10th percentileWeek 2: 63rd percentileWeek 3: 49th percentileWeek 4: 48th percentileWeek 3: 78th percentileWeek 5: 23rd percentile

Stat by stat

  • EPA per dropback

    Too close to call

    A −0.0931st of 40

    B +0.0319th of 40

  • Success rate

    Too close to call

    A 47%15th of 40

    B 46%17th of 40

  • Accuracy over expected

    Too close to call

    A +0.2 pts25th of 38

    B −0.2 pts29th of 38

  • Sack rate (lower is better)

    Too close to call

    A 3.6%4th of 40

    B 3.7%5th of 40

Style

  • Average depth of throwCase Keenum: 7.4 yds · Matthew Stafford: 9.7 yds
  • Deep throwsCase Keenum: 8% · Matthew Stafford: 13%

“Clearly ahead” means the gap is bigger than what the plays behind each number could produce by chance. “Slightly” means it points one way but could still be noise.

← All players

Data: nflverse play-by-play, CC BY 4.0. Also FTN charting, Pro Football Reference advanced stats, snap counts and injury reports, all through nflverse. Calculations and charts by Raiders Rundown.

Case Keenum vs Matthew Stafford: stats compared in context | Raiders Rundown