Players › Compare

Compare two players

Put two players who do the same job side by side. For each stat you see where both rank in the league, and whether the gap between them is bigger than the noise a few plays create.

Player one

Player two

Grades updated Rechecked every few hours on game days

A Green Bay Packers · DB

Brandon Cisse

40overall grade, below average

90th of 96 cornerbacks

B New England Patriots · DB

Charles Woods

42overall grade, below average

86th of 96 cornerbacks

On the stats that count, Brandon Cisse and Charles Woods are too close to separate with the plays we have. 5 are too close to call.

The year so far: Yards allowed per target

Where each has ranked among cornerbacks after every week. Solid line is Brandon Cisse, dashed is Charles Woods.

WorstMiddleBestrecent12345Week 2: 91st percentileWeek 3: 83rd percentileWeek 4: 10th percentileWeek 2: 19th percentileWeek 3: 1st percentileWeek 4: 3rd percentile

Stat by stat

  • Yards allowed per target (lower is better)

    Too close to call

    A 12.993rd of 96

    B 11.186th of 96

  • Passer rating allowed (lower is better)

    Too close to call

    A 11689th of 96

    B 10674th of 96

  • Completion rate allowed (lower is better)

    Too close to call

    A 71%82nd of 96

    B 71%82nd of 96

  • Passes defended per target

    Too close to call

    A 7%69th of 96

    B 7%69th of 96

  • Missed tackles (lower is better)

    Too close to call

    A 10%49th of 90

    B 11%56th of 90

Style

  • Depth of passes at himBrandon Cisse: 13.0 yds · Charles Woods: 10.8 yds

“Clearly ahead” means the gap is bigger than what the plays behind each number could produce by chance. “Slightly” means it points one way but could still be noise.

← All players

Data: nflverse play-by-play, CC BY 4.0. Also FTN charting, Pro Football Reference advanced stats, snap counts and injury reports, all through nflverse. Calculations and charts by Raiders Rundown.

Brandon Cisse vs Charles Woods: stats compared in context | Raiders Rundown