Players › Compare

Compare two players

Put two players who do the same job side by side. For each stat you see where both rank in the league, and whether the gap between them is bigger than the noise a few plays create.

Player one

Player two

Grades updated Rechecked every few hours on game days

A Pittsburgh Steelers · DB

Asante Samuel Jr.

41overall grade, below average

88th of 96 cornerbacks

B Buffalo Bills · DB

Dee Alford

45overall grade, about average

69th of 96 cornerbacks

On the stats that count, Asante Samuel Jr. and Dee Alford are too close to separate with the plays we have. 4 are too close to call.

The year so far: Yards allowed per target

Where each has ranked among cornerbacks after every week. Solid line is Asante Samuel Jr., dashed is Dee Alford.

WorstMiddleBestrecent12345Week 2: 25th percentileWeek 3: 21st percentileWeek 4: 26th percentileWeek 2: 5th percentileWeek 3: 2nd percentileWeek 4: 6th percentile

Stat by stat

  • Yards allowed per target (lower is better)

    Dee Alford is slightly ahead

    A 12.790th of 96

    B 8.870th of 96

  • Passer rating allowed (lower is better)

    Too close to call

    A 10471st of 96

    B 9459th of 96

  • Completion rate allowed (lower is better)

    Too close to call

    A 53%29th of 96

    B 55%35th of 96

  • Passes defended per target

    Too close to call

    A 16%34th of 96

    B 10%55th of 96

  • Missed tackles (lower is better)

    Too close to call

    A 31%89th of 90

    B 24%86th of 90

Style

  • Depth of passes at himAsante Samuel Jr.: 15.1 yds · Dee Alford: 9.8 yds

“Clearly ahead” means the gap is bigger than what the plays behind each number could produce by chance. “Slightly” means it points one way but could still be noise.

← All players

Data: nflverse play-by-play, CC BY 4.0. Also FTN charting, Pro Football Reference advanced stats, snap counts and injury reports, all through nflverse. Calculations and charts by Raiders Rundown.

Asante Samuel Jr. vs Dee Alford: stats compared in context | Raiders Rundown