Players › Compare

Compare two players

Put two players who do the same job side by side. For each stat you see where both rank in the league, and whether the gap between them is bigger than the noise a few plays create.

Player one

Player two

Grades updated Rechecked every few hours on game days

A New York Giants · LB

Arvell Reese

58overall grade, above average

5th of 65 linebackers

B Minnesota Vikings · LB

Blake Cashman

57overall grade, above average

6th of 65 linebackers

On the stats that count, Arvell Reese and Blake Cashman are too close to separate with the plays we have. 3 are too close to call.

The year so far: Missed tackles

Where each has ranked among linebackers after every week. Solid line is Arvell Reese, dashed is Blake Cashman.

WorstMiddleBestrecent12345Week 1: 100th percentileWeek 2: 100th percentileWeek 3: 100th percentileWeek 4: 100th percentileWeek 2: 56th percentileWeek 3: 75th percentileWeek 4: 82nd percentile

Stat by stat

  • Missed tackles (lower is better)

    Too close to call

    A 3%10th of 65

    B 0%1st of 65

  • Tackles per 100 snaps

    Too close to call

    A 14.023rd of 63

    B 14.024th of 63

  • Tackles for loss per 100 snaps

    Too close to call

    A 1.217th of 63

    B 1.316th of 63

Style

  • Pressures per 100 snapsArvell Reese: 0.8 · Blake Cashman: 3.8

“Clearly ahead” means the gap is bigger than what the plays behind each number could produce by chance. “Slightly” means it points one way but could still be noise.

← All players

Data: nflverse play-by-play, CC BY 4.0. Also FTN charting, Pro Football Reference advanced stats, snap counts and injury reports, all through nflverse. Calculations and charts by Raiders Rundown.

Arvell Reese vs Blake Cashman: stats compared in context | Raiders Rundown