Players › Compare

Compare two players

Put two players who do the same job side by side. For each stat you see where both rank in the league, and whether the gap between them is bigger than the noise a few plays create.

Player one

Player two

Grades updated Rechecked every few hours on game days

A Tennessee Titans · LB

Anthony Hill Jr.

51overall grade, about average

28th of 65 linebackers

B San Francisco 49ers · LB

Fred Warner

53overall grade, about average

27th of 65 linebackers

On the stats that count, Anthony Hill Jr. and Fred Warner are too close to separate with the plays we have. 3 are too close to call.

The year so far: Missed tackles

Where each has ranked among linebackers after every week. Solid line is Anthony Hill Jr., dashed is Fred Warner.

WorstMiddleBestrecent12345Week 1: 100th percentileWeek 2: 100th percentileWeek 3: 78th percentileWeek 4: 46th percentileWeek 1: 69th percentileWeek 2: 79th percentileWeek 3: 80th percentileWeek 4: 85th percentile

Stat by stat

  • Missed tackles (lower is better)

    Anthony Hill Jr. is slightly ahead

    A 2%8th of 65

    B 7%35th of 65

  • Tackles per 100 snaps

    Too close to call

    A 15.517th of 63

    B 15.716th of 63

  • Tackles for loss per 100 snaps

    Too close to call

    A 0.054th of 63

    B 0.445th of 63

  • Yards allowed per target (lower is better)

    Too close to call

    A 6.920th of 44

    B 5.811th of 44

Style

  • Pressures per 100 snapsAnthony Hill Jr.: 0.4 · Fred Warner: 0.8

“Clearly ahead” means the gap is bigger than what the plays behind each number could produce by chance. “Slightly” means it points one way but could still be noise.

← All players

Data: nflverse play-by-play, CC BY 4.0. Also FTN charting, Pro Football Reference advanced stats, snap counts and injury reports, all through nflverse. Calculations and charts by Raiders Rundown.

Anthony Hill Jr. vs Fred Warner: stats compared in context | Raiders Rundown